12/3/2023 0 Comments Shotcut upscaling![]() I had a combination of scanned film, interlaced DV files, 720p and 1080p files. For myself, I when through a project a few years ago to curate and archive all my old home films. I would say that it depends on your goals. My system: i5 7600 3.5GHz processor, 16 GB RAM, NVidia GeForce GT 1030, 64 bit Windows 10 (latest version) Shotcut version 20.02.17Ĭould anyone on the forum tell me if I’m wasting my time trying this way? I accept it is unlikely to export a perfect film but could someone point me in the right direction please. Would changing the deinterlacer from good to best help the quality? I tried playing around with the filters, (sharpen, white balance etc.) with some success but have to be careful not to go mad with the values. At 80% the file almost doubled and again I’m not sure about the results being better. I’ve tried increasing the quality from 55% increasing gradually to 80%. I’ve tried increasing the fps and this seemed to have a positive effect. Could anyone on the forum tell me if I’m wasting my time trying this way? Reading articles about increasing resolution seem to differ, one says don’t bother and another says it helps. On my later films, mp4, I tried increasing the resolution from 720 to 1080 but I’m not sure if the result was any better, (difficult to see a difference). I have various formats of film, wvm, mpg, mp4, and mov. Not sure if this is true but it stuck in my head as something to aim for.I am pretty new to Shotcut and I’ve been trying to better the quality of my home movies. Also, I read somewhere that with 1080p HD, YouTube doesn’t compress the audio as bad. With 720p, they would only allow 720 and 480p. If my video was 480p, YouTube would only allow 480p. ![]() My understanding with YouTube was they assign resolution scales only going as high as your original video. In your honest opinion, aside from the larger file size not contributing any positive thing to the video quality – do you think the 1080p HD upscale made it look maybe a little worse? I know this may sound ironic considering the original video is bad and saturated, but, just curious because I couldn’t tell and I definitely didn’t want to make it any worse with an upscale. I appreciate your comment and for taking the time to look at the original video and my Shotcut edit. ![]() I really didn’t know if this was good or bad, only that it didn’t look any worse as far as my eye could tell, and the only thing I wanted to change was to achieve the 4:3 ratio, opposed to the 16:9. ![]() Again, my original guess for how I ended up with HD was because I added an audio file to the project first and the project was automatically set to 1920x1080 30fps. To be honest, I’m really amateur at video editing to the point that I didn’t even know I had scaled up the original video to HD. Any input is sincerely appreciated, thank you! Sorry if these are extremely amateur questions. What has happened to my video, is this considered an ‘upscale’?Īlso, is it possible to keep the 1080p upscale, but, at a 4:3 ratio (is this considered 1440x1080p)? My guess for the reason is because the first file I added to my project was an Audio file, and the resolution and frame rate was automatically set to the HD 1080p 30 fps before I added my first video clip.Īside from the black bars on the ends, it looks good I am making a video using clips with following details:Īfter I finished it and then exported it for YouTube (.mp4), it now currently has the following details: I am going to try my best at explaining it right here. Hi, I have been searching through the FAQ for a solution to my problem but feel like I don’t understand how to phrase it properly to even begin to find the right solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |